Nitro vs Sumatra PDF
July 03, 2023 | Author: Adam Levine
Nitro and Sumatra PDF are both PDF viewing software, but they have distinct differences in terms of features and user experience. Nitro is a comprehensive PDF solution that offers a wide range of features for viewing, editing, and collaborating on PDF documents. It provides advanced editing tools, such as text and image editing, as well as features for creating and filling out forms, adding annotations, and securing documents. Nitro is suitable for users who require extensive PDF functionalities and collaboration capabilities. On the other hand, Sumatra PDF is a lightweight and minimalist PDF reader that focuses on simplicity and speed. It offers essential viewing features, such as navigation, zooming, and searching within PDF documents. Sumatra PDF is known for its fast performance and small file size, making it an excellent choice for users who prioritize speed and simplicity over advanced functionalities.
See also: Top 10 PDF Readers
See also: Top 10 PDF Readers
Nitro vs Sumatra PDF in our news:
2015. Adobe's competitor Nitro acquired document marketing service DoxIQ
Nitro, the document management company known for its Nitro PDF reader, which is touted as the top alternative to Adobe Acrobat, has recently acquired DoxIQ, a document analytics company. DoxIQ specializes in providing individuals with valuable insights into document workflows, including details on who has viewed specific parts of a document, the frequency of views for different sections, and the ability to set automatic notifications for specific document changes. These features greatly simplify and expedite document collaboration, approval, and signing processes for individuals. As part of the acquisition, Nitro will smoothly transition DoxIQ customers to its own document sharing and e-signature product, NitroCloud. Leveraging Nitro's robust capabilities, users will have the ability to modify content, identify sensitive material, approve document language, and efficiently search and organize their documents based on content.