 |
Feng Office vs Redmine
May 21, 2023 | Author: Adam Levine
2
Feng Office is an integrated suite of software designed to help your organization run better. Stay connected to your customers, meet project deadlines, find information faster and grow your organization.
18
Redmine is a flexible alternative project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database. Redmine is open source and released under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 (GPL).
Feng Office and Redmine are both project management tools with distinct features and approaches. Feng Office is a comprehensive project management solution that provides features such as task management, document management, collaboration, time tracking, and project planning. It offers a centralized platform for teams to manage their projects and streamline their workflows. Feng Office places a strong emphasis on collaboration and organization, making it suitable for teams that require a comprehensive project management solution. Redmine, on the other hand, is an open-source project management tool that focuses on issue tracking, project tracking, and team collaboration. It offers features such as issue management, Gantt charts, time tracking, and integration with version control systems. Redmine is highly customizable and can be tailored to fit specific project requirements.
See also: Top 10 Office suites
See also: Top 10 Office suites
Feng Office vs Redmine in our news:
2014. Redmine 2.5 impoves custom fields
Redmine, a versatile web application for project management developed using the Ruby on Rails framework, has released its latest version - Redmine 2.5.0, which is now available for download. This update brings numerous enhancements to custom fields formats, including support for text formatting, HTTP links, and more precise selection options for user and version custom fields based on roles and version status. The custom field format API has undergone a complete rewrite, so if you have any plugins that interact with it (e.g., those adding non-standard field formats), it is necessary to update them before proceeding with the upgrade. Additionally, this version introduces experimental support for Markdown formatting, a widely used syntax for text formatting.
