 |
DotNetNuke vs Joomla
May 17, 2023 | Author: Michael Stromann
4
DotNetNuke is a Web Content Management Platform (or CMS) for Microsoft ASP.NET, powering over 700,000 production web sites worldwide. The flexible DotNetNuke open source CMS platform also functions as a web application development framework. Depending on your role within your organization, DotNetNuke provides powerful benefits to support your Web initiatives.
5
Joomla is a free and open source content management system (CMS) for publishing content on the World Wide Web and intranets and a model–view–controller (MVC) Web application framework that can also be used independently.
DotNetNuke (DNN) and Joomla are both popular content management systems (CMS) with their own unique features and capabilities. DotNetNuke, now known as DNN Evoq, is built on the Microsoft .NET framework and primarily targets organizations using Windows-based servers. It offers a user-friendly interface, extensive customization options through modules and themes, and seamless integration with Microsoft technologies. DNN is well-suited for businesses seeking a Windows-based CMS that provides ease of use, flexibility, and scalability.
Joomla, on the other hand, is an open-source CMS built on the PHP programming language. It offers a wide range of features, including content management, user management, extensibility through extensions and templates, and multilingual support. Joomla's strength lies in its robust community and vast library of extensions, making it highly customizable and suitable for a variety of projects.
See also: Top 10 Enterprise Portals
Joomla, on the other hand, is an open-source CMS built on the PHP programming language. It offers a wide range of features, including content management, user management, extensibility through extensions and templates, and multilingual support. Joomla's strength lies in its robust community and vast library of extensions, making it highly customizable and suitable for a variety of projects.
See also: Top 10 Enterprise Portals
DotNetNuke vs Joomla in our news:
2022. Joomla recommends to upgared to 4 version
Joomla, the free and open-source CMS designed for publishing web content, has recently launched two new versions: Joomla 4.1.3 and 3.10.9. These updates include bug fixes and various enhancements, such as the addition of a task scheduler, child templates, and an accessibility checker. Built on the model-view-controller architecture, Joomla allows users to develop powerful online applications independently of the CMS, providing the flexibility to create dynamic websites. The latest CMS version, Joomla 4.1.3, empowers users to build websites that can scale and adapt to their evolving needs. While Joomla 3.10 can still be used for new projects, the Joomla team strongly recommends utilizing Joomla 4 for its improved features and capabilities. As Joomla 3.10 is approaching its End of Support (EOS), with less than six months remaining for bug fixes and one year for security fixes until August 17, 2023, users are encouraged to transition to the newer 4.x version. Joomla 4.x, available for nearly a year now, offers numerous enhancements and leverages the latest production versions of PHP, enhancing both the security and performance of websites.
2005. IBM bemoans Joomla-Mambo split
A senior IBM software executive expressed disappointment regarding the Mambo open-source publishing software project and the subsequent emergence of the Joomla project, wherein the developers migrated with the source code. In an interview on Tuesday, Rod Smith, Vice President of Emerging Internet Technology for IBM's Software Group, remarked that it is unfortunate for both the Mambo project and its customers. He noted that the company overseeing Mambo seemed to have veered off course, prioritizing its own interests over those of the open-source community. Smith considered this to be a negative development as Mambo had gained significant traction, and the creation of the Joomla fork undermines its progress. The conflicts arising from such situations are particularly unwelcome among corporate customers. Smith clarified that these customers are not apprehensive about open-source software itself, but they are concerned about the repercussions seen in the Mambo case. Should a similar scenario unfold, it would entail considerable rework and inconvenience for these customers.
